Core Web Vitals can affect how Google ranks your SPA website
This post will get deep into what Google’s upcoming ranking algorithm update means for websites engineered with the Single Page Application architecture. When we did the research, we were left with a feeling that Google’s, otherwise really awesome, web performance metric team has ended up unfairly disadvantaging SPA websites. The Core Web Vitals performance metrics, that from May will be included in the search ranking algorithm, do not accurately reflect the entire user experience on SPA websites.
We will start out by with giving a brief introduction to Single Page Applications then, we will describe how the Core Web Vitals doesn’t reflect the full user experience on a SPA website. We will conclude by speculating on what it will actually mean for your Google ranking.
Single Page Applications as websites
As illustrated above the archetypical lifecycle of a SPA website is as follows:
- Show loading animation
- Show the actual content of the initial page view
- Load the next page view in the client
Single Page Application websites are gaining popularity. Two trends are driving this:
- Delivering a rich user experience – i.e., an application-like experience
- Decoupling the front-end from the back-end – i.e., the Headless Architecture
From a development perspective, the SPA approach provides almost full control to the front-end developer to create an engaging user experience. Single Page Applications are not a new concept with the canonical example of a SPA being Gmail, dating back to 2004. But only for the last 3-5 years has the SPA model begun to be relevant for websites, as viable solutions to problems of initial load and indexing by search engines have emerged.
Core Web Vitals and SPA websites
From a performance perspective, a SPA website is an interesting phenomenon and with Google’s upcoming ranking algorithm update to include page experience even more so. The compromise of front-loading the website as a rich client-side application on the initial page load, to achieve a richer and faster experience on the following page views must now be seen in a different light.
Come May 2021 a set of performance metrics will be included as a ranking signal in Google’s Page Experience update. The performance metrics were introduced in 2020 and named the Core Web Vitals. They seek to answer the following 3 questions in a quantifiable way:
1: How fast does the page load?
- Metric: Largest Contentful Paint – LCP
- Target: 2.5 seconds
2: How fast is the page stable?
- Metric: Cumulative Layout Shift – CLS
- Target: 0.1
3: How fast is the page useable?
- Metric: First Input Delay – FID
- Target: 100 ms
All targets are for the 75th percentile. If you want to know more about the details of the metrics, we recommend reading our How fast should your website be in 2020 post.
As we have mentioned a few times already, the main idea from a performance perspective with the SPA website is that you pay a high price up front, so the following page views can leverage on that investment. Depending on your traffic pattern, that is a model that can work for some sites.
All of the Core Web Vitals targets are technically challenging to stay within on that initial page view. Downloading and spinning up a full SPA website is necessary before the actual content can be shown to the user. What we can see is that developers have to work really hard to achieve the goals that the Core Web Vitals sets forth. In order to receive the promised boost to your SEO ranking you must be within the targets for all 3 Core Web Vitals.
How the Core Web Vitals are unfair to SPA website
You would think that you could sacrifice a set of mediocre metrics on the initial page view, and then having the following page views level out those initially poor numbers. But this is where you need to be aware that the Core Web Vitals don’t really care about all of those subsequent page views.
Let us repeat that. Even though your users will experience navigating around your site as though LCP was 0.5 seconds, this is not the experience that is collected by Google and used for the Page Experience Ranking Signal. The underlying data for your potential SEO boost, will only use the first initial LCP of perhaps 3-4 seconds.
To add insult to injury, the CLS is actually continuing to be accumulated during the user’s navigating around your site. So, a simple page navigation can incur further damages to your CLS score.
Google acknowledges that the Core Web Vitals have their limitations for SPA websites – or “long-lived pages” as Google refers to them. And we can understand why it is technically challenging to measure performance in a SPA website and Google has promised to evolve the Core Web Vitals. But for now, you as a website owner have to be aware of how Google measures your website’s performance and uses it for search ranking.
How does this affect your ranking?
Now that we understand how the Core Web Vitals affects a SPA website’s metrics, we must address the question of how big the impact this disadvantaged measuring technic has to your search engine ranking.
The inclusion of the Web Core Vitals in the Page Experience update is being talked about as being more a carrot than a stick. So, a passed Core Web Vitals assessment can be an extra boost to your rankings. You have to look at your direct competitors to understand if this is something that will actually hurt you.
As always pay attention to your own business metrics and your competitors before investing in web performance optimisation.
If you want to improve the performance of your SPA website or further understand how your website is affected by Google’s May algorithm update, then reach to us at Enterspeed.